Proposition 137 Arizona 2025 Proposal. Opinion Proposition 137 won't turn down the broiler on Arizona judges Some have said the proposal is an effort to protect Arizona Supreme Court Justices Clint Bolick and Kathryn H Arizonans overwhelmingly voted against it, with a whopping 77.4% of voters voting no on it with well over half the estimated.
Arizona Proposition 137 cuts voters out of how judges are retained Phoenix New Times from www.phoenixnewtimes.com
Proposition 137 was referred to the ballot by the Legislature. Proposition 137 would amend the Arizona Constitution to weaken the judicial merit selection and retention system for Arizona Supreme Court justices, judges on the Arizona Court of Appeals and judges.
Arizona Proposition 137 cuts voters out of how judges are retained Phoenix New Times
Proposition 137 would amend the Arizona Constitution to weaken the judicial merit selection and retention system for Arizona Supreme Court justices, judges on the Arizona Court of Appeals and judges. This model, now known as Arizona's judicial retention system, was established by voters in 1974 through Proposition 107, a voter-led ballot initiative Live video debate of Arizona's Proposition 137 — about ending term limits for judges — hosted by the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission and the Arizona Media Association.
Arizona Proposition 137 Election Results 2024 End Term Limits for Judges The New York Times. Progress Arizona, a progressive advocacy and lobbying organization, requested that the high court block the ballot measure and prevent it from going. Arizonans overwhelmingly voted against it, with a whopping 77.4% of voters voting no on it with well over half the estimated.
Stand for Children lauds Gov. Hobb’s Prop. 123 proposal Arizona Digital Free Press. 137 would also give legislators authority to order investigations against judges suspected of "a pattern of malfeasance," though the proposal does not define what activities would. Proposition 137 was referred to the ballot by the Legislature.